The creation of new industrial management models and the creation of innovative products and services, capable of embodying the most innovative technologies in the territory, are the prerogatives that can make possible the massive transformation of the real estate market according to what I would define “building 0.0”.
A building that “resets”
A new way of understanding construction and consequently the entire real estate market, starting from what is at the origin of an anthropocentric way of building and living. A building that “eliminates” all that is against man and the environment to enhance all architectural forms and innovative technologies that wisely blend to enhance only the “well-being” of man: precisely a new anthropocentric building.
If we look for the meaning of the word “well-being” we find the definition: “Well-being (from well – to be = “to be well” or “to exist well”) is a state that involves all aspects of the human being and characterizes the quality of life of every single person.
So where to start this process of research for a home that makes the well-being of the person possible?
Construction 0.0 means starting from the origin, from the zero point of a research. The zero point begins with eliminating any condition that is contrary to the person and his “existing well” and “existing well while respecting the environment”.
Benessere psico-fisico
A would start with zeroing out everything that binds and weights the building world in its foundations, in its “position 0.0”. I would start by eliminating emissions into the atmosphere, every consumption, waste in the environment and the useless waste of resources and precious materials, I would begin by eliminating the waste of human and organizational potential eliminating the inefficiencies that make the environment unsafe and buildings or that generate poor quality real estate products, to eliminate any discomfort that does not allow to create the essential conditions for the pursuit of psycho-physical well-being which is the premise of the superior and ontological well-being from which this whole process of research springs.
I believe that these are the premises and bases from which to start again and on which to reconstruct the future of living, but I believe that these “resettings” are also the elimination of those ballasts that hold the building firm, in a suspensive condition, in a long moment of inertia that does not allow it to restart, to start running again, for a future of living where the person and his “being well” are always at the centre.
